A court in Finland sentenced Simon Ekpa to six years in prison Monday for terrorism-related offenses, concluding the Nigerian-born Finnish citizen used his social media influence to orchestrate violence in Nigeria’s southeastern region. The Päijät-Häme District Court in Lahti reached a unanimous verdict against the 40-year-old, who had declared himself “Prime Minister” of the Biafra Republic Government in Exile.
Conviction Details and Evidence
Ekpa was convicted of participating in terrorist organization activities, inciting public crimes with terrorist intent, aggravated tax fraud, and violations of Finland’s Lawyers Act. Prosecutors presented evidence showing he systematically leveraged his substantial following on platform X between August 2021 and November 2024 to encourage attacks against Nigerian civilians and authorities while supplying weapons, explosives, and ammunition to armed groups through his contact networks.
The trial, conducted over 12 sessions between May and June 2025, heard testimony from neighbors who alleged Ekpa used coded language during phone calls to coordinate violence. Finnish authorities arrested him in December 2024 alongside four others initially suspected of financing his operations, though charges against the co-conspirators were later dropped due to insufficient evidence.
Related: Nigeria faces pivotal constitutional reforms in 2027
Diplomatic Pressure and International Response
The conviction followed sustained diplomatic pressure from Nigeria’s government, which had repeatedly requested Finnish intervention regarding Ekpa’s activities. President Bola Tinubu praised Finland’s cooperation in January 2025, stating his administration “will not tolerate actions and statements that could lead to divisiveness among citizens.”
Nigeria’s Defence Headquarters welcomed the outcome as a “significant victory” in counterterrorism efforts, with army spokesperson Tukur Gusau expressing hope for eventual extradition proceedings. The Enugu State Government offered to provide evidence of “Ekpa-sponsored atrocities” and described him as a “common criminal, con man, and terrorist” who has “no interest of Igbo people at heart.”
The Indigenous People of Biafra distanced itself from Ekpa, with spokesman Emma Powerful stating he “has never been a registered member of IPOB” and accusing him of recruiting “violent criminals to destabilize the South East region.” The arrest created tensions within Nigeria’s Finnish community, with many Nigerian residents reportedly fearing retribution from Ekpa’s supporters.
Related: Nigeria’s online loan trap and how to escape
Courtroom Defense Draws Criticism
Ekpa denied IPOB membership during cross-examination, claiming he was merely a “content creator” producing entertainment videos. This defense strategy backfired spectacularly online, with users across platforms condemning what they viewed as cowardice from someone who previously claimed responsibility for deadly sit-at-home protests in southeastern Nigeria. Social media users particularly criticized his failure to use the court platform to present Biafran independence arguments, instead opting for what many called an “escape route” defense.
The case establishes precedents for how international courts handle politically-motivated digital incitement, particularly when social media campaigns orchestrated from abroad result in real-world violence and civilian casualties. Whether this sentencing will lead to actual extradition to Nigeria remains uncertain, as Finnish authorities have not indicated whether they would transfer him to serve his sentence there.
